Sunday, October 14, 2012

Well-defined queries leads to accurate responses :

In chapter two of “Writing in the content area”, Amy Benjamin provides the guiding principles for framing and evaluating the writing task. This chapter beautifully emphasize on all the elements of achieving a clear and meaningful task. It is often very difficult for the students to write an assignment according to the expectations of the teachers when there is very less information given.  It is very important for the teachers to clearly and precisely provide the details and requirements of the writing task. Sometimes the teachers are vague and not specific, which leads to the room of errors from the student side. Focusing on the key question words helps the students to improve in their writing responses. Bloom’s Taxonomy is one of the best models that provide the hierarchy of thinking levels.

When the students are inquired to write a certain amount of words, they use repetition and empty words to fulfill the requirement of the length of the paper. Definitely, Quality of the paper is more important than its quantity. I really like the idea of asking detailed question within an assignment to keep the focus of the students in one direction. It helps the students to avoid unnecessary words and elevate thinking in their writing tasks. In a well-constructed writing task, it should suggest the number of well-developed paragraphs instead of exact amount of words or pages. When the teachers are well-defined in their queries, students are precise and accurate in their responses. The sample writing tasks in the chapter provides a vivid picture of leaky versus airtight writing task. It also specifies examples for how to incorporate the writing in other content areas.

Framing the writing task is not problematic only but evaluating a writing task is very challenging too. Grading a writing task and assignment is not an easy job for the teachers as well. However, the concept of rubric makes it easier to grade because it is simply a checklist of the things what students are going to be graded on. Rubrics not only help the teachers to grade the task, but also help students to understand the teacher’s expectations and standards. Absence of the rubric leads to imprecise and ambiguous writing tasks.

This chapter provides a great amount of information that can be incorporated in the class room to enhance the writing abilities of the students. Prescriptive evaluation and self-reflective Assessments also improve student’s work. I learned a lot from it and hoping to apply it in the future.

2 comments:

  1. The chapter definitely does provide a great deal of information that (I am hoping) will be useful in our classrooms. I find self reflective assessments to be particularly helpful because they force us to re-examine our work. Rather than having someone else leave several comments, we go back and force ourselves to see what is working and what can be fixed. Your comment on grading writing comments intrigued me because recently we had a conversation on this topic at our weekly grade meeting and several teachers felt grading writing was very subject because as teachers we learn to understand our students strengths’ and weaknesses and grade them according to the learning environment in our classrooms. Other teachers however felt a rubric would be helpful and the entire grade should grade according to a specific standard. I have mixed feelings about both responses because what might be considered a high level in my class, depending on my students abilities and the content area that was learned and mastered so far, might actually be a lower grade in another teachers room. So when I read your comment, I found myself in agreement. It definitely is a tricky and difficult subject to grade.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Thank you so much for your comment Mahmoona, I am in total agreement with your point that self-reflective assessments are quite helpful in a classroom. Even with us, if we proofread our work, it helps us to figure out the mistakes and error that we missed in our first draft. I also express a similar sentiment that even from a student’s point of view, it’s not embarrassing for them to re-examine and correct the error rather than another person pointing out their mistake. As far as concept of using a rubric is concerned, there is no doubt about it that it gives a clear direction and path to both student and the teacher. They both can work out to endeavor for the same goal. I personally think that in the presence of a rubric, even it wouldn’t be difficult for a substitute teacher to grade the student’s work, who might not be familiar with the individual student’s abilities and content areas they have learned and mastered with their teacher. So it’s quite useful to maintain a justice level and standards among students as well. No doubt this chapter provided a lot more information on all the content areas. Sample writing tasks help to differentiate from a leaky and airtight writing task. Hopefully, I will use some of the information from here to deal with these complex issues in future.

      Delete